Many Democrats, maybe most, favor abolishing the Electoral Faculty. Their argument is easy and highly effective: The presidential candidate who will get essentially the most votes ought to win. The counterargument is more durable to clarify however, to my thoughts, extra persuasive: The Electoral Faculty forces presidential candidates to marketing campaign in all components of the nation and enchantment to a broader coalition of voters.
However take into account one other advantage of the Electoral Faculty: It diminishes the specter of fraud. If the presidential election had been determined just by tabulating votes nationwide, unscrupulous partisans would have each motive to interact in old style ballot-box-stuffing. They might goal locations with lax safety or corrupt authorities and run up their tallies. Below the Electoral Faculty, in contrast, fraudsters must know not solely how to cheat, however the place. Within the occasion of an in depth race, they should know which state or states will swing the election. However after all they haven’t any manner of figuring out such a factor, no matter their lavishly paid consultants would possibly inform them.
The would-be cheaters already perceive that it does them no good to run up numbers in California and the District of Columbia, or in South Dakota and Tennessee. They should pad their numbers in a “battleground state,” a state that may go both manner. However there are loads of battleground states. Which one ought to the cheaters goal?
In 2000 the reply would have been Florida, however no person knew that till election evening. In 2004 all people was prepared for one more squeaker in Florida, however George W. Bush gained the state by virtually 390,000 votes, or 5% of the entire. That 12 months the state that determined the election was Ohio, however that info was unavailable till after polls closed. A couple of outstanding Democrats fancied that Republicans had used chicanery to get the end result they wished, however the concept intelligent GOP operatives had by some means recognized the entire race could be gained or misplaced in Ohio defied plausibility.